The London Daily News


29 November, 2010 12:52 (GMT +00:00)
Tomilnson officer to face "gross misconduct" charge
Article Video Photos
News Desk

The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has this morning, Monday 29 November 2010, served gross misconduct allegations against PC Simon Harwood in relation to the death of Ian Tomlinson during the G20 protests.


Since the Crown Prosecution Service decision in July not to prosecute PC Harwood, the MPS has been progressing bringing disciplinary proceedings in liaison with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

This has been extremely complex with extensive legal consultation over the process and nature of the allegations. Significant time has been required to prepare the disclosure requirements of the large amount of documents which legally had to be served at the time of the misconduct allegations. In the region of 14,000 documents were reviewed as part of the preparation, with approximately 1,500 pages served this morning on PC Harwood.

Following IPCC agreement to the MPS proposed misconduct allegations, PC Harwood has now been notified that he will face a gross misconduct hearing to answer allegations that he pushed and struck Mr Tomlinson, and that such dangerous actions inadvertently caused or contributed to the death of Mr Tomlinson

The misconduct panel is made up of three people who will be assisted by a legal advisor. The two senior MPS officers will be Deputy Assistant Commissioner Lynne Owens and Commander Julian Bennett. The third person is an independent member of the public who is selected from a list managed by the Metropolitan Police Authority.

The chair of the panel, DAC Owens, is normally required to hold the hearing within 30 working days after service of papers on the officer. The proceeding can be adjourned however if it is necessary to do so.

The MPS is currently writing to relevant interested parties so that any representation about the proposed timing of the hearing can be considered by the Chair.

The misconduct process is not intended to be a means of airing criminal allegations. Its sole purpose is to determine whether the officer's conduct fell below the standards required of a police officer and to provide a suitable discipline outcome should the allegation be found proven.

Should the gross misconduct allegations be proven the most serious outcome available to the panel would be dismissal without notice.

 
Wikio

Text Comments Post a Text Comment
 
There are currently no Item comments.
 
 
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Click for more

Cables: Afghanistan rife with corruptionU.S. diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks paint a picture of corruption in Afghanistan at every level -- except for Agriculture Minister Asif Rahimi, "about whom no allegations of bribery exist." WHERE IS ASSANGE? | FULL STORY

Yes
No
Maybe
View Results
215 Votes

Popular News

Traffic statistics in the UK show record 50 mile jam on M20
Westfield "rip off" parking charges at Christmas
Afternoon assault on woman in West End leads to police hunt for man
Illegal migrants to pile up problems for Greece
Schools in north London "forced" to stay open to prevent economic meltdown
Snow vs Fashion
PM considers rethink over school sports cuts

FASHION & STYLE | NEWS | LONDON POLITICS | INTERNATIONAL NEWS | BUSINESS NEWS | GADGET CITY | MOTORING NEWS | EATING OUT GUIDE | CRIME DESK | OLYMPICS | PROPERTY | COLUMNISTS | TRAVEL | EDITORIAL | ENTERTAINMENT | SPORTS | LONDON TENNIS | CONTACT US | ARTS & EVENTS | Investor Relations and Corporate | CLASSIFIEDS | SUBSCRIPTION (JOIN US FOR FREE) | LETTERS TO THE EDITOR